Is KI BMS subject to the CLOUD Act?

No. The CLOUD Act compels US-based companies (or US subsidiaries) to hand over data they control, regardless of where it physically lives. KI BMS has no US entity, no US contracts, and no US-controlled infrastructure in the data plane. Stripe processes payment data and is US-headquartered, but that boundary is well-defined: payment metadata only, never your records.

Where exactly is my data stored?

On dedicated servers we operate ourselves, physically located in Germany. The audit log, attachments, embeddings - everything in the data plane - lives there. Backups stay within the same EU jurisdiction in different physical locations and roll off on a 30-day window. We deliberately do not name the exact data centre - knowing the rack does not buy the customer anything and would make operator changes a public event.

Do you log IPs or session metadata to a US service?

No third-party analytics, no Google Analytics, no Meta pixel, no third-country tag manager. The first-party device + session ledger lives in our own Postgres + Redis - same EU boundary as the rest of the data plane. Logs are operational only and rotate at 30 days.

What happens if I'm a customer outside the EU?

You can use KI BMS from anywhere. The data still lives in the EU; the request travels from your location to our servers and back. That's a posture choice on our side, not a geo-restriction on yours.

KI BMS

Pricing

Compare

KI BMS: the EU alternative to Ashby

Same job, hosted in the EU. KI BMS runs in Germany under German law - your data stays in EU jurisdiction end to end.

EU alternative

ATS

Comparison

Premium

Finn GlasCo-Founder + Engineering

·January 18, 2026·

2 min read

If your reason for moving off Ashby is data sovereignty, the comparison gets simpler. KI BMS is hosted in Germany on infrastructure we operate ourselves - no US-headquartered company in the request path. The CLOUD Act does not reach what physically lives here.

At a glance

Ashby is right when you're a 100+-staff tech company with dedicated TA and want an all-in-one stack: ATS + CRM + analytics + scheduler + sourcing in one tool. KI BMS is right when you're 8-100 staff and want a dedicated ATS productive in 10 minutes. Ashby is deep, powerful, expensive; KI BMS is lean, fast, transparent on price. Pipeline functions overlap; the surroundings differ.

EU jurisdiction

What 'EU-hosted' actually means here, end to end

KI BMS runs on dedicated machines we operate ourselves, physically located in Germany. There is no US-headquartered subprocessor in the request path - the data plane (your records, your files, your audit log) lives entirely in EU jurisdiction. Two third parties exist outside that boundary: Stripe (payment information only, under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework) and the mail relay for transactional email. Neither sees your records. Ashby's setup is the variable - if their primary infra is US-based, the CLOUD Act applies regardless of what their privacy page claims.

KI BMS vs Ashby: EU comparison

	Ours KI BMS	Theirs Ashby
Hosted in Germany
Careers page included
Analytics suite	Standard	Best-in-class
Talent CRM	Talent pool	Full CRM with nurture
Scheduler built in
KI fit-score built in		Add-on (Ashby AI)
Multi-voice scorecards
Free tier
Starting price	€0 / €1 / €10 / month	Quote (4-5-figure per year)
GDPR auto-anonymisation		Configurable
Language	DE + EN	EN-first

When to pick which

Pick KI BMS when

You're 8-100 staff in DACH. Ashby's depth isn't needed, the price hurts.

Hosting in Germany + DPA in 24h are mandatory.

Public pricing + monthly contracts.

Pick Ashby when

You're 100+-staff tech with ambitious analytics needs (funnel cohorts, pass-through rates, diversity reporting).

Your TA has 3+ dedicated sourcers + a coordinator team for scheduling.

You have procurement with multi-year contracts and accept a 5-figure annual budget.

EU-jurisdiction questions

Specific to where the data lives, who can subpoena it, and what crosses borders.

Start with KI BMS

Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.

Written by

Finn Glas

Co-Founder + Engineering

Finn is one of the Co-Founders. He owns the engineering side, the infrastructure, and most of the late-night fixes that ship before anyone notices.

finn.glas at aicuflow dot comLinkedIn Website