Compare
What moving from rexx HR to KI BMS actually looks like in 2026.

KI BMS is what people use when rexx HR stops fitting. Below is the honest side-by-side - same product surface, different posture: hosted in Germany, no third-party trackers, one honest price - plus the migration mechanics that decide whether the switch lands in an evening or in a quarter.
rexx HR is a full HR suite (employee files, payroll integration, recruiting, onboarding, talent management) with German legal grounding and enterprise experience. KI BMS is only the recruiting module - but productive faster, KI pre-sort in the free tier, monthly cancellation. Need a real HR suite? Pick rexx. Want a dedicated ATS? Pick us. Common reality: rexx HR for files, KI BMS for the pipeline.
Switching
The switch goes in three rough phases: export from rexx HR, import into KI BMS, and reorganise what came over. Most people allocate an evening for it. The export side is where the time goes - rexx HR hands you a CSV/JSON dump and the field mapping isn't always obvious; once that's resolved the import is a couple of minutes. We don't paywall the import path or pretend it's a pro-only feature, and you can run both side-by-side while you decide.
| Ours KI BMS | Theirs rexx HR | |
|---|---|---|
Employee files | ||
Payroll integration | ||
Onboarding module | ||
Talent management (LMS) | ||
ATS module | ||
KI fit-score | ||
Kanban pipeline | Table with status | |
Hosted in Germany | ||
Free tier | ||
Setup time | Hours | Weeks to months |
Starting price | €0 / €1 / €10 / month | from ~5-figure per year |
Contract model | Monthly | 12-36 months |
rexx HR is a mature suite running in 500+-employee enterprises for years. The value is consolidation: employee data, jobs, applications, files, performance, training in one tool, one source of truth, one audit log. Teams that need that are well served.
What suite logic doesn't do well: fast iteration, KI-first features, light setup paths. A suite has grown into an existing enterprise IT landscape; a specialist starts with the recruiting workflow as the core and makes that fast. Both logics are valid - they just fit different companies.
In the pilot teams we know, this is the common pattern: rexx HR keeps files + payroll + onboarding (set up once, runs); KI BMS runs in parallel as the recruiting layer. The handoff is at hire: the person is created fresh in rexx HR (or migrated by CSV), the application data stays archived in KI BMS. Nobody misses the integration; the clean split is worth it.
Find the export option in rexx HR's account settings. Most tools provide a CSV or JSON download. Save the dump locally - that's the source of truth for the next step.
Open the import tool in KI BMS. rexx HR's field names rarely match KI BMS' 1:1; the import flags any unmapped columns so you can pair them up before anything commits.
Run the import. KI BMS shows a preview of the first parsed rows in the import dialog so you can sanity-check the column mapping + a sample of records before anything commits. If you're nervous about a large dump, import a small subset first, verify it landed the way you expected, then run the full file.
rexx HR-specific UI metadata (custom views, saved filters, in-app annotations) doesn't transfer with the data export. Spend an evening rebuilding the views you used most - usually a 30-minute job once you've done it once.
Run both side-by-side for a couple of weeks if you want to be sure. When you're confident, cancel the rexx HR subscription from their side. KI BMS keeps your export option self-serve in account settings - no lock-in either direction.
Switching from rexx HR
Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.
Read next
Full KI BMS vs rexx HR
rexx HR covers the full HR spectrum + ATS in a suite. KI BMS is recruiting only - but faster and with KI from day 1.
Read
KI BMS vs Personio: the right recruiting tool for modern HR teams
Suite vs specialist: when an integrated HR tool wins - and when a dedicated ATS sets you free.
Read
KI BMS vs Greenhouse: enterprise ATS or European leanness?
When Greenhouse's complexity + price are worth it - and when KI BMS just fits better.
Read
KI BMS vs Lead-Table: agentic applicant tracking compared
Two modern, German, KI-driven recruiting tools - placed side by side.
Read