Can Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor use KI BMS directly?

Yes, via the MCP server. It's a stdio JSON-RPC server that wires into Claude Desktop, Cursor, or any MCP-aware client in five lines of config. The list of tools matches your data model 1:1 - whatever a CRUD type exposes in the UI is exposed identically to the agent.

Do agent calls share the same auth + access controls?

Yes. The MCP server authenticates with the same JWT or PAT a human session uses. Sharing rules, org membership, rate limits, suspicion bans - all of it applies. There's no "agent backdoor" that bypasses the access matrix.

Is there an audit trail for agent actions?

Yes. Every mutation goes through the same audit-log path as a UI click. The transport (UI / API / CLI / MCP) is recorded as channel metadata so you can filter "what did the agent do this hour" from your account history.

Can I rate-limit an agent separately from a human?

Per-token rate limits apply, so you can issue an agent its own PAT and cap it independently. The shared user-level bucket also caps total throughput, so a runaway loop can't drain your whole account. The CLI's auto-update channel marker means you can also see in audit which version is calling.

Does the MCP / API surface cost extra?

No. Same plan, same surface. We don't paywall the agent - it's the same product, the same schema, the same access gates. If a plan can do X in the UI, it can do X via MCP.

KI BMS

Pricing

Compare

KI BMS: the agent-friendly alternative to rexx HR

Same product, same surface for humans and AI agents. MCP server + CLI + drop-in clients in 15 languages.

Agentic alternative

ATS

HR suite

Comparison

Finn GlasCo-Founder + Engineering

·January 7, 2026·

2 min read

KI BMS ships an MCP server you can wire into Claude Desktop or any MCP client in five lines. The same auth + access gates apply, the same audit log records every action, the same rate limits apply. rexx HR doesn't currently expose this surface - that's the gap.

At a glance

rexx HR is a full HR suite (employee files, payroll integration, recruiting, onboarding, talent management) with German legal grounding and enterprise experience. KI BMS is only the recruiting module - but productive faster, KI pre-sort in the free tier, monthly cancellation. Need a real HR suite? Pick rexx. Want a dedicated ATS? Pick us. Common reality: rexx HR for files, KI BMS for the pipeline.

Agent surface

What 'agent-friendly' actually means in practice

KI BMS ships an MCP server, a CLI, and drop-in clients in 15 languages. They're auto-generated from the same schema your UI uses; the auth, the access gates, the rate limits, the audit log all apply identically whether you're clicking buttons or calling the API. rexx HR doesn't currently expose this surface, which is the gap a serious agent integration trips over - the agent ends up scraping the UI through a browser, which is fragile, slow, and silently bypasses everything below.

KI BMS vs rexx HR: agent-readiness comparison

	Ours KI BMS	Theirs rexx HR
Payroll integration
Employee files
Onboarding module
Talent management (LMS)
ATS module
KI fit-score
Kanban pipeline		Table with status
Hosted in Germany
Free tier
Setup time	Hours	Weeks to months
Starting price	€0 / €1 / €10 / month	from ~5-figure per year
Contract model	Monthly	12-36 months

When to pick which

Pick KI BMS when

Recruiting is the bottleneck; the rest of HR is manageable with Excel + DATEV.

You want your ATS set up in an afternoon, not a quarter.

Small to mid team (8-100 employees), not controlled by procurement.

Pick rexx HR when

200+ employees, want employee files + onboarding + payroll integration in one tool.

Procurement + works council require a mature HR suite with enterprise experience.

Talent management + training should be connected to the ATS.

Agentic-integration questions

What an agent-builder asks before wiring a tool into Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor.

Start with KI BMS

Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.

Written by

Finn Glas

Co-Founder + Engineering

Finn is one of the Co-Founders. He owns the engineering side, the infrastructure, and most of the late-night fixes that ship before anyone notices.

finn.glas at aicuflow dot comLinkedIn Website