Can Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor use KI BMS directly?

Yes, via the MCP server. It's a stdio JSON-RPC server that wires into Claude Desktop, Cursor, or any MCP-aware client in five lines of config. The list of tools matches your data model 1:1 - whatever a CRUD type exposes in the UI is exposed identically to the agent.

Do agent calls share the same auth + access controls?

Yes. The MCP server authenticates with the same JWT or PAT a human session uses. Sharing rules, org membership, rate limits, suspicion bans - all of it applies. There's no "agent backdoor" that bypasses the access matrix.

Is there an audit trail for agent actions?

Yes. Every mutation goes through the same audit-log path as a UI click. The transport (UI / API / CLI / MCP) is recorded as channel metadata so you can filter "what did the agent do this hour" from your account history.

Can I rate-limit an agent separately from a human?

Per-token rate limits apply, so you can issue an agent its own PAT and cap it independently. The shared user-level bucket also caps total throughput, so a runaway loop can't drain your whole account. The CLI's auto-update channel marker means you can also see in audit which version is calling.

Does the MCP / API surface cost extra?

No. Same plan, same surface. We don't paywall the agent - it's the same product, the same schema, the same access gates. If a plan can do X in the UI, it can do X via MCP.

KI BMS

Pricing

Compare

KI BMS: the agent-friendly alternative to Excel / Google Sheets

Same product, same surface for humans and AI agents. MCP server + CLI + drop-in clients in 15 languages.

Agentic alternative

ATS

Sheets

Recruiting

Finn GlasCo-Founder + Engineering

·April 13, 2026·

2 min read

KI BMS ships an MCP server you can wire into Claude Desktop or any MCP client in five lines. The same auth + access gates apply, the same audit log records every action, the same rate limits apply. Excel / Google Sheets doesn't currently expose this surface - that's the gap.

At a glance

A spreadsheet is a fine ATS for one person, one role, roughly 30 applications. The moment any of those three doubles, the workflow breaks. KI BMS is the answer for exactly that point - before you're force-migrated into an enterprise tool.

Agent surface

What 'agent-friendly' actually means in practice

KI BMS ships an MCP server, a CLI, and drop-in clients in 15 languages. They're auto-generated from the same schema your UI uses; the auth, the access gates, the rate limits, the audit log all apply identically whether you're clicking buttons or calling the API. Excel / Google Sheets doesn't currently expose this surface, which is the gap a serious agent integration trips over - the agent ends up scraping the UI through a browser, which is fragile, slow, and silently bypasses everything below.

KI BMS vs Excel / Google Sheets: agent-readiness comparison

	Ours KI BMS	Theirs Excel / Google Sheets
Automated GDPR retention
Auto-send emails
Drag-and-drop pipeline
KI fit-score
Multi-user edits, no conflicts		In theory
Public careers page
Who-changed-what audit log		Version history
Zero setup cost	Free + €1

When to pick which

Pick KI BMS when

Two or more people work on the same recruiting.

Three or more roles open at once.

Applications arrive faster than colour-coding the sheet keeps up.

You have a GDPR audit incoming or an open retention question.

Pick Excel / Google Sheets when

Exactly one open role, one HR person, no more than 30 applications.

You're in find-yourself mode and don't know if you'll ever hire again.

Agentic-integration questions

What an agent-builder asks before wiring a tool into Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor.

Start with KI BMS

Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.

Written by

Finn Glas

Co-Founder + Engineering

Finn is one of the Co-Founders. He owns the engineering side, the infrastructure, and most of the late-night fixes that ship before anyone notices.

finn.glas at aicuflow dot comLinkedIn Website