Can Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor use KI BMS directly?

Yes, via the MCP server. It's a stdio JSON-RPC server that wires into Claude Desktop, Cursor, or any MCP-aware client in five lines of config. The list of tools matches your data model 1:1 - whatever a CRUD type exposes in the UI is exposed identically to the agent.

Do agent calls share the same auth + access controls?

Yes. The MCP server authenticates with the same JWT or PAT a human session uses. Sharing rules, org membership, rate limits, suspicion bans - all of it applies. There's no "agent backdoor" that bypasses the access matrix.

Is there an audit trail for agent actions?

Yes. Every mutation goes through the same audit-log path as a UI click. The transport (UI / API / CLI / MCP) is recorded as channel metadata so you can filter "what did the agent do this hour" from your account history.

Can I rate-limit an agent separately from a human?

Per-token rate limits apply, so you can issue an agent its own PAT and cap it independently. The shared user-level bucket also caps total throughput, so a runaway loop can't drain your whole account. The CLI's auto-update channel marker means you can also see in audit which version is calling.

Does the MCP / API surface cost extra?

No. Same plan, same surface. We don't paywall the agent - it's the same product, the same schema, the same access gates. If a plan can do X in the UI, it can do X via MCP.

KI BMS

Pricing

Compare

KI BMS: the agent-friendly alternative to d.vinci

Same product, same surface for humans and AI agents. MCP server + CLI + drop-in clients in 15 languages.

Agentic alternative

ATS

Comparison

DACH

Julia YukovichCo-Founder + CEO

·March 26, 2026·

2 min read

KI BMS ships an MCP server you can wire into Claude Desktop or any MCP client in five lines. The same auth + access gates apply, the same audit log records every action, the same rate limits apply. d.vinci doesn't currently expose this surface - that's the gap.

At a glance

d.vinci is right for German corporates and large mid-markets from 250 staff that want an established ATS with deep approval workflows, multi-level permissions, and long market presence. KI BMS is right for modern mid-markets up to 100 staff that want KI pre-sort as a default, value monthly contracts, and don't want a 6-month implementation process. Both are German-centric, both understand GDPR - they target different generations of buyers.

Agent surface

What 'agent-friendly' actually means in practice

KI BMS ships an MCP server, a CLI, and drop-in clients in 15 languages. They're auto-generated from the same schema your UI uses; the auth, the access gates, the rate limits, the audit log all apply identically whether you're clicking buttons or calling the API. d.vinci doesn't currently expose this surface, which is the gap a serious agent integration trips over - the agent ends up scraping the UI through a browser, which is fragile, slow, and silently bypasses everything below.

KI BMS vs d.vinci: agent-readiness comparison

	Ours KI BMS	Theirs d.vinci
API + webhooks + MCP		API yes, MCP no
Approval workflows + permissions	Mid	Very deep
KI fit-score built in		First KI features from 2025
Careers page builder
Multi-posting job boards
Audit log + GDPR auto-anonymisation		Manually configurable
Hosted in Germany
Multi-voice scorecards
Setup time	Hours	Weeks with implementation partner
Pricing model	Public (€0 / €1 / €10 per month)	Quote-only, individually negotiated
Minimum term	None - monthly	1-3 years typical

When to pick which

Pick KI BMS when

You're up to 100 staff and recruiting has no dedicated 6-month implementation slot.

You want KI pre-sort with reasoning as default - not as a KI module rolled out from 2025.

Public prices and monthly cancellation matter to you - no 3-year contract with quote-only pricing.

Pick d.vinci when

You're 250+ staff and need multi-level approval workflows with fine-grained permissions.

Established market presence with implementation-partner network has concrete procurement value.

Your corporate compliance expects a tool 20+ years in market - not a 2026 player.

Agentic-integration questions

What an agent-builder asks before wiring a tool into Claude / ChatGPT / Cursor.

Start with KI BMS

Free plan, no credit card. We host in Germany. Export + delete are self-serve.

Written by

Julia Yukovich

Co-Founder + CEO

Julia is one of the Co-Founders. She handles design, product direction, and most of the support replies that arrive in the morning.

julia.yukovich at aicuflow dot comLinkedIn